AI note-taker bots

Organizations that block or restrict AI note-taker bots

Trippi Notes team · facts checked on 2026-10-01

Bots from Otter, Read.ai, Fireflies and similar services join calls as an extra participant. A growing number of organizations now block them or limit them by policy. This page lists the ones we could check on their own websites, with a short quote and a link to each source.

The list

We checked every row on 2026-10-01. Each one links to the organization’s own page: its IT help article, its policy, or its official announcement. We did not add a row when the only source was a news story or a vendor blog. The date is the one the page gives. Where the page gives none, we say so.

OrganizationTypeWhat is restrictedDate on the pageIn their words
Harvard University (US)UniversityThird-party AI meeting assistants should not be used in Harvard meetings. Only tools with a Harvard enterprise agreement; announce the assistant and stop if anyone objects.Not stated“AI meeting assistants should not be used in Harvard meetings” (source)
Cornell University (US)UniversityRead.ai and Fireflies.ai bots are blocked from the university Zoom (cornell.zoom.us).Not stated“Read.ai and Fireflies.ai are currently automatically blocked from joining Cornell Zoom meetings” (source)
Tufts University (US)UniversityUnapproved AI bots, including Read.ai, are blocked from Tufts Zoom and Tufts Microsoft Teams. Zoom AI Companion is the approved tool.Posted Nov 10, 2024“unapproved AI bots, including tools like Read.ai, are blocked from Tufts Zoom” (source)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)UniversityBots from otter.ai, read.ai, fireflies.ai, meetrecord.com, sembly.ai and hal.ai are blocked from UW-hosted Zoom meetings.Oct 23, 2024“blocked several 3rd party AI bots from joining UW-hosted Zoom meetings” (source)
University of Washington (US)UniversityRead AI integrations are blocked for UW Zoom and Microsoft Teams; people are asked to deactivate it.Teams block on January 21 (Zoom earlier)“blocking Read AI’s integrations to UW Zoom and MS Teams is necessary” (source)
UC Riverside (US)UniversityThird-party AI note-taking tools such as Fireflies AI, Spinach AI and Read AI are blocked from UCR-hosted Zoom meetings.Effective Oct 10, 2025“will be blocked from joining meetings hosted by UCR-based Zoom accounts” (source)
UC San Diego (US)UniversityGuidelines for AI assistants: no capture of meetings with the most sensitive data, and the host must turn AI features off if a participant objects.Not stated“If a Meeting participant objects to Capturing by the host, the Meeting may not be Captured” (source)
Virginia Commonwealth University (US)UniversityOtter.ai is blocked on the university network; Zoom’s own transcription is suggested instead.Page updated Jun 12, 2026“Otter.Ai has been blocked due to lack of contractual obligations to protect VCU data” (source)
City University of New York (US)UniversityRead.ai and Otter.ai bots are blocked from CUNY online meetings (notice sent to York College faculty).From Sep 11 (notice dated Sep 5, 2025)“CUNY will block existing Read.ai and Otter.ai user agents” (source)
Morgan State University (US)UniversityZoom settings reject unauthorized AI note-taking bots (Fireflies.ai, Otter.ai, Read.ai, MeetGeek and others) from university-hosted meetings.As of Jun 10, 2026“has blocked unauthorized third-party AI meeting note-taking bots from university-hosted Zoom meetings” (source)
Stony Brook University (US)UniversityOtter.ai, Read.ai and Fireflies.ai are not approved; hosts block their domains in Zoom and use Zoom AI Companion.Page updated Oct 14, 2025“For security reasons, these tools are not approved for usage.” (source)
Chapman University (US)UniversityRead AI is prohibited; adding the Read AI app is blocked in Zoom and Microsoft Teams.Aug 13, 2025“the use of Read AI is prohibited due to security, privacy, and institutional data risks” (source)
San Francisco State University (US)UniversityOtter.ai can no longer connect to SF State-hosted Zoom sessions.Jan 17, 2024“we will begin blocking Otter.ai access to Zoom” (source)
University of Notre Dame (US)UniversityZoom AI Companion is the approved tool; third-party bots such as Otter.ai, Fireflies.ai, Fathom.ai and Read.ai should be removed.Sep 18, 2025“NO third-party transcription bots should ever be allowed into any meetings” (source)
University of Nebraska (US)UniversityWith Zoom AI Companion adopted as the note-taking tool, tools such as Otter.ai are blocked from Zoom meetings.Jan 29, 2025“other tools such as Otter.ai will now be blocked from joining Zoom meetings” (source)
Georgetown University (US)UniversityNon-Zoom third-party AI bots such as Otter.ai are prohibited by the security office.Not stated“prohibits other non-Zoom third-party AI bots, such as Otter.ai” (source)
Rice University (US)UniversityIT guide to keep unapproved bots such as fireflies.ai, read.ai and otter.ai out of Zoom meetings.Page updated Apr 15, 2025“How to Prevent and Remove Unapproved AI bots from Zoom Meetings” (source)
University of Cambridge (UK)UniversityAll members are advised to keep AI note-taking bots out of Teams meetings; licensed Microsoft Copilot is fine to use.Not stated“We recommend that all University members prevent AI note-taking bots’ access to Teams meetings” (source)
University of Waterloo (Canada)UniversityThird-party AI note-taking bots are not permitted in university-hosted meetings; Teams transcription and Copilot Chat are the approved options.Not stated“Third-party AI note-taking bots are not permitted in UW-hosted meetings.” (source)
City of Bellevue, Washington (US)Public bodyAI notetakers are not permitted for general use, and most are disabled in city-hosted Teams meetings. Members of the public may still use them at public meetings.Not stated“AI notetakers are currently not permitted for general use.” (source)
Derbyshire County Council (UK)Public bodyExternal AI notetakers such as Otter AI and Fireflies must not be invited to council-hosted meetings; Copilot is the approved tool.Sep 3, 2025“You must not invite or permit external AI notetakers (e.g. Otter AI, Fireflies etc.)” (source)
ASAE, the association for association executives (US)AssociationAny AI note-taking tool is prohibited in meetings held or sponsored by ASAE, virtual or in person.Mar 26, 2025“During meetings, the use of any AI notetaking tools is prohibited.” (source)
Chief (US)CompanyAI notetakers are not allowed in Core groups, identity-based conversations or Chief-hosted virtual events, except for listed exceptions.Not stated“AI Notetakers will not be allowed to join Core group meetings” (source)
EnergyWerx (US)NonprofitAI notetaker bots are removed from group meetings, and repeat users are no longer invited.Not stated“No .ai notetakers will be allowed to join EnergyWerx group meetings.” (source)

Rules change, and a page can move. If a link no longer says what the row says, please tell us (see below). This list is not complete. It is the set we could confirm.

Why organizations restrict these bots

These are the reasons the sources above give, in their own terms. We have only grouped them.

  • Meeting data leaves the organization. Recordings and transcripts are kept on the vendor’s servers, outside the organization’s control. Morgan State, CUNY and Notre Dame say this directly.
  • There is no contract. Without an agreement, there are no limits on what the vendor may do with the data. VCU, Georgetown and Harvard name this.
  • Other people did not agree. The University of Washington says Read AI can join and transcribe “without the awareness or consent of other attendees”. SF State says an Otter.ai agent gives other users no way to know about it.
  • Bots join on their own. Some bots read a user’s schedule, join even when that user is absent, come back after removal, and email summaries to everyone. Waterloo and UW describe this.
  • Laws about personal data. Cornell points to FERPA, the US law on student records. UC San Diego bans capture in meetings with health or financial information.
  • Training and later misuse. UC Riverside warns meeting content could be used to train AI models without consent, or reach unauthorized people.
  • People talk less freely. Bellevue says notetakers “may make people uncomfortable and can produce inaccurate or misleading information”.

What they usually allow instead

Most of these organizations do not ban AI notes as such. They limit them to tools covered by their own contract, where the data stays inside their systems.

  • Built-in AI in the meeting platform. Zoom AI Companion is the approved choice at Tufts, Stony Brook, Notre Dame, Nebraska and UW–Madison. Morgan State also allows Gemini “Take Notes for Me” in Google Meet.
  • Microsoft Copilot under the organization’s licence. Cambridge says information “stays within the University’s Microsoft tenancy”. Derbyshire County Council and Waterloo name Copilot too.
  • The platform’s own transcript. VCU points to Zoom’s native transcription; Waterloo to Teams transcription.
  • Notes by a person. ASAE asks people to rely on “traditional methods of notetaking”. Derbyshire says minutes are taken by hand if an external attendee objects to Copilot.

Even approved tools come with conditions. Chapman recommends Zoom AI Companion only “provided there is consent from all meeting participants”, and Harvard asks hosts to turn assistants off in sensitive meetings.

If you want notes from a meeting

A ban on bots is usually about the data and about consent, not about the bot as such. Keep that in mind when you choose a tool.

  1. 1Read your own rules first. Search your IT help pages for “AI notetaker” or “meeting assistant”. Many organizations have a page like the ones above.
  2. 2Ask before the meeting, not during it. If the rule is unclear, ask IT or the meeting host. A short email now is better than an awkward moment in the call.
  3. 3Use the approved tool if there is one. Often this is Zoom AI Companion, Microsoft Copilot or Gemini in Meet, already paid for under your organization’s contract.
  4. 4Tell everyone, every time. Say at the start that you are taking AI notes, and stop if anyone objects. Our consent guide has lines you can use.
  5. 5If AI tools are not allowed, take notes by hand. Write decisions, owners and dates. That is most of what a summary gives you anyway.

A browser extension is still an AI tool. An extension like ours does not join the call, so “block bots” settings in Zoom or Teams will not catch it. That does not make it allowed. Several policies above cover any AI note-taking tool, not only bots. If your organization allows only approved tools, an extension that is not on its list is not allowed either. Ask first.

If you host and want to keep bots out, our guide on how to stop AI note-taker bots walks through the settings in Zoom, Teams and Google Meet.

Send us a correction

Is a row wrong, out of date, or missing? Write to [email protected] with a link to the organization’s own page. We add rows only from primary sources, and we update the date at the top when we check again.

Where Trippi Notes fits, and where it does not

Trippi Notes is a Chrome extension. After you click its icon, it turns the sound of the meeting tab into a transcript with speaker names, then a summary and tasks. No bot joins the call.

That is not a way around any rule on this page. If your organization limits AI note-taking tools, it limits this one too, unless your IT team says otherwise. Use it only where you are allowed to, and tell people you are taking notes; see how to ask for consent. More on how it works: notes without a bot.

FAQ

Asked about this.

Which universities block Otter.ai or Read.ai?+

In our check on 2026-10-01, among others: VCU, SF State, Nebraska, CUNY and Georgetown restrict Otter.ai, and Cornell, Tufts, the University of Washington, Chapman and UC Riverside block Read.ai or similar bots. The table above links to each source.

Why do companies and universities ban AI note-takers?+

The reasons they give are about data and consent: meeting content is stored outside the organization, there is no contract with the vendor, other attendees did not agree, and some bots join meetings on their own.

Is a browser extension allowed where bots are blocked?+

Not automatically. Bot-blocking settings may not see an extension, but many policies cover any AI note-taking tool. Check your organization’s rules or ask IT before you use one, and tell people in the meeting.

How do I report a mistake in this list?+

Email [email protected] with a link to the organization’s own page. We only add or change rows from primary sources.

Read next

Ask first. Tell people. Then take good notes.

Trippi Notes is in the Chrome Web Store. One click on the icon when the call begins, and nothing before that.

Add to Chrome